From 764d5c6b325b65888cfa61d87cded73fd5814382 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Fischer <thomas.fischer@ufz.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 06:01:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix spelling in reactive transport process docu.
---
web/content/docs/benchmarks/reactive-transport/calcite.pandoc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/web/content/docs/benchmarks/reactive-transport/calcite.pandoc b/web/content/docs/benchmarks/reactive-transport/calcite.pandoc
index 98b93e6a049..f0354532938 100644
--- a/web/content/docs/benchmarks/reactive-transport/calcite.pandoc
+++ b/web/content/docs/benchmarks/reactive-transport/calcite.pandoc
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ The operator-splitting (OS) model formulation (Strang, 1968) with a sequential n
A comparison of the numerical data is shown in the figure below. The numerical results of OGS-6 are in good agreement with those of OGS-5. The maximum number of absolute error in terms of varying element concentrations is $2.15\times10^{-5}$ ($\mathrm{Cl}$), $1.13\times10^{-5}$ ($\mathrm{Mg}$), and $4.57\times10^{-6}$ ($\mathrm{Ca}$).
-{{< img src="../ResultComparison.png" width="80" title="Results for numerical (OGS-5 - with empty cicle marker, OGS-6 - with empty triangle marker) results together with concentration distribution in the domain and mesh resolution for different time steps.">}}
+{{< img src="../ResultComparison.png" width="80" title="Results for numerical (OGS-5 - with empty citrcle marker, OGS-6 - with empty triangle marker) results together with concentration distribution in the domain and mesh resolution for different time steps.">}}
{{< data-link >}}
--
GitLab