diff --git a/web/content/docs/benchmarks/hydro-component/HC_ogs6-vs-ogs5.md b/web/content/docs/benchmarks/hydro-component/HC_ogs6-vs-ogs5.md
index f834c75c2361b3bb42a2833e353b9a5569ef5dfd..cea750fd19f138a0be919e91769c420bb2f3e336 100644
--- a/web/content/docs/benchmarks/hydro-component/HC_ogs6-vs-ogs5.md
+++ b/web/content/docs/benchmarks/hydro-component/HC_ogs6-vs-ogs5.md
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ The mass transport simulation results (figures below) show an expected heterogen
 {{< img src="../heterogeneous/concentration_2d.png" title="Concentration distribution at simulation time $1e8$ s for the 2D setup.">}}
 {{< img src="../heterogeneous/concentration_3d.png" title="Concentration distribution at simulation time $1e8$ s for the 3D setup.">}}
 
-[The project files for the 2D setup are here.]({{< data-url "Parabolic/ComponentTransport/heterogeneous/ogs5_H_2D/ogs5_H_2D.prj" >}})  
-[The project files for the 3D setup are here.]({{< data-url "Parabolic/ComponentTransport/heterogeneous/ogs5_H_3D/ogs5_H_3D.prj" >}})
+[The project files for the 2D setup are here.]({{< data-url "Parabolic/ComponentTransport/heterogeneous/ogs5_H_2D/ogs5_H_2d.prj" >}})  
+[The project files for the 3D setup are here.]({{< data-url "Parabolic/ComponentTransport/heterogeneous/ogs5_H_3D/ogs5_H_3d.prj" >}})
 
 
 ## Literature