Discuss access of properties
The following discussion from !4373 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@chleh started a discussion: (+2 comments) A problem that we generally have in OGS is, that we usually refer to mesh properties by their name, only. It has been like this in the past, and it also continues in this MR. In real world OGS use cases, this is not a problem, at least at the moment. But the practice of referring to properties by name only, leads to some restrictions and makes it harder to change certain things in OGS. For example, integration point data must have the suffix
_ip
to not collide with possibly present nodal data. As we are heading towards more automation in simulation workflows, it might be good to be more strict in the mesh property handling in the OGS internals. I don't want to make a big problem out of this for this MR. We can also (briefly) discuss this somewhere, maybe in the OGS meeting. @TomFischer, @endJunction, what do you think?