Follow-up from "Feflow converter - use ogs6py"
Rework software architecture.
The following discussion from !78 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@joergbuchwald started a discussion: (+1 comment) From the ogs6py side, it looks good. However, is there a reason why you don't use a class structure? I find it a bit hard to dig through the code as all functions are on the same level. It seems to me that there is no distinction made between public and private functions, or can be all functions in
tools.py
considered to be private or is only the 'client' public?